‘The Creature from the Black Lagoon’: series of feature articles in a magazine

Hi and welcome to The Green Castle 🙂

My interest in the topic of “classic monster characters” in the spec-fic range has been increasing in the last year or two and there are certain particular monsters that have a way of catching the attention, no matter how brief a glance I take at ‘monster magazines’ in a  newsagency.  This turned out to be true for me, once again, a little less than a week ago, when I saw  the March/April 2013 issue (#266) of Famous Monsters of FilmLand magazine in a city newsagency. I decided to buy a copy as an addition to holiday reading over Easter Long Weekend. By the time I’d finished  the second article on Good Friday morning, I realised that making a few comments about the articles  could make a good topic for a blog post. 🙂 I’ll get to the matter of the magazine itself in a later post.

The articles:

Issue #266 of the Famous Monsters of FilmLand magazine dedicates the great majority of feature space to two series of articles: one each about ‘The Creature from the Black Lagoon’ and the ‘Wicked Witch of the West’ as played by Margaret Hamilton in the original ‘The Wizard of Oz’ movie. I’ll comment on the Witch articles in a different post.

The lavishly illustrated articles (pp.12-36) on The Creature cover a fair variety of aspects of its life as a very unusual  original film-industry creation that actually became iconic well beyond the silver screen.  During the Cold War,  the trilogy  of Creature films  – ‘The Creature from the Black Lagoon’, ‘Revenge of the Creature’ and ‘The Creature Walks Among Us’ – contributed to the 1950s craze for 3D movies. There was the original compelling artwork and costume design, dedicated work by various  stuntmen whose own very high level of fitness and stature when doing the land and water scenes made the Creature seem fittingly powerful and menacing, the sheer profit-making power of the trilogy that then influenced many other monster films for decades afterwards, plus directing and producing matters.  Throw in some unpleasant credit-stealing and other studio politics, but that was largely lost on the audiences and only ‘came to light’ in later decades.  There was also the strangely powerful grip the Creature had and has on the Public Imagination  (which in itself can be pretty monstrous).

From what I could gather in the articles, some of the reasons for the Creature (also known as ‘Gill-Man’) being unusual for the movies of 1950s America, included:  an exceptional level of skill and resources applied to the artwork, sets  and costume production in an era when Monster Films were already ‘on the way out’ in Hollywood;  the fact the title-role character wasn’t created as a post-war nuclear mutant or Mad Scientist’s experiment but as an actual made-for-Hollywood (using, apparently, some ideas from actual Amazon River legends that had been mentioned at an A-list party in 1940s) character within Hollywood and that the first two films became significant in the fuelling of the 3D movie craze.  The final film, in the early ’60s, was screened after the 3D craze had faded.  Add some powerfully lurid graphic art for the movie posters, some inspired (or sometimes just plain lucky) casting decisions for key characters that helped “bring the story alive” on screen, the great stunt work mentioned above and one  stand-out factor in that by the third movie  the audiences were actually more often on the Creature’s side than not!   All the three films were meant to be horror flicks in which human characters were meant to be consistently and ultimately preferred by the paying audiences and this was in an era of regular atomic testing, electric shock therapy in asylums and liberal use of lab rats, etc.  By the last parts of the third Creature movie  it has been prodded, shot at innumerable times, repeatedly operated on in some very ruthless and sickening experimental surgical processes and imprisoned in various ways.  It also kidnapped various sultry swimsuit-clad heroines who had, of course,  also been the “object of affection” for the films’ various leading and supporting male characters. 🙂  The Creature’s kidnappings were vividly featured in a fair range of the movie posters as well as in scenes in the movies.   However, according to the magazine’s contributing writers, cinema audiences eventually saw that for all the Creature had wreaked a lot of havoc, it had a basic common trait with the already-heroic Hunch-back of Notre Dame: the Creature had  a poignant and powerful hope, however doomed, that was to be able to simply live on its own terms and even “find love” instead of being reviled and hunted.  Now, this is too late for the Creature itself to feel any better, but I think some justice of a sort has been awarded to The Creature by it achieving story-telling immortality and icon status beyond the likely intent of its various creators. 🙂

In addition to the commentaries on the movies and the Creature character itself, plus the influences on Horror films and Hollywood productions, later articles in this same series go into the  matters of movie-related pop culture, both at the time of original studio releases and in later decades. I was very interested to find that Creature-related collectibles not only still exert a hold on many collectors and fans of the movies, but also consistently command a higher price than for items relating to other monsters and ‘monster movies’ of the same era.  The magazine’s editor admits to doing some ‘field research’ of his own…and loving it. 🙂


4 thoughts on “‘The Creature from the Black Lagoon’: series of feature articles in a magazine

  1. Many thanks, Cheryse. 🙂 Although I had heard/read something about the Creature many years ago, that was well before I got into Specfic in any big way. So, the articles have been a real discovery for me too.
    Writing about them for a blog post was a good way to ensure a close reading of the articles… and thereby get just a bit more value out of the fairly steep (AUS$20.95, approx. 80 pages) cover price of the magazine issue. 🙂

    I’ll be looking for more Creature lore soon. 🙂

    Cheers! 🙂

    • Thanks, Helen. 🙂 I also haven’t seen them yet but am looking forward to it; my blog post was based largely on the cited set of magazine artcles, a response to them, plus an increasing general interest in such film-world
      I came across the ‘Famous Monsters of Film World’ magazine a few years back and have, when I can actually find it in any Canberra newsagencies at all, to be a rich source of information on various forms of cinematic creepiness. 🙂 No luck in seeing any copies in the Dealers’ Room at the con, though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s